🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive action to restrict social networking access for young people below 16 is sending ripples around the globe. Officials, campaigners, and parents are monitoring with great interest to see if this approach will set a precedent for countries abroad.

European Movement

Throughout Europe, a growing number of countries are exploring parallel bans.

• Denmark has stated a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the PM arguing that smartphones and networks are "stealing our youngsters' childhood". The policy may be passed soon.
• Norway is preparing to implement a access barrier of 15, citing the need to shield children from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is introducing a digital ID system to confirm the user details of social media users. Officials have suggested that an Australia-style ban remains "a potential options in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the president has called on parliament to pass a proposal increasing the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has endorsed a comparable move, including an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The authorities in the Netherlands has urged families to restrict their youngsters from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has passed a symbolic resolution supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 except if guardian approval is granted. Even though it warns of the "compulsive" nature of these platforms, the resolution does not enact binding law.

"A strong age limit is a good starting point," stated one European lawmaker supporting the initiative.

Britain: A Cautious Stance

Across Britain, the government has not ruled out a possible ban, emphasizing that "no measure is being dismissed" but insisting any decision must be "based on conclusive research".

Previously, interest gathered behind a bill to impose restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was eventually modified. However, the administration pledged to investigate the issue.

Charities have raised concerns. One foundation founded by the loved ones of a young person who took her own life after encountering disturbing online content argues that a strict age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could create a "cliff edge" of harm when young people turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the refusal of the tech sector to design tools that are secure and age appropriate for children," commented a influential peer.

The United States: A Decentralized Landscape

Across America, legislation is primarily happening at the state government level against a backdrop of federal gridlock.

• Utah requires adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and limits overnight use.
• Florida has signed a bill prohibiting those below 14 from accessing social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has passed a regulation limiting teenagers to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with extra access requiring adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also introduced measures demanding parental consent for teenagers to create social media accounts.

Even with cross-party agreement and suggestions from various individuals to follow Australia's path, a US-wide ban is currently seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Perspectives

Apart from these regions, other states are also considering moves.

• Malaysia intends to ban social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, international organizations adopt a more nuanced position. Unicef has cautioned that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "may even backfire". The agency highlights that social networks can be a "critical link" for vulnerable young people and that government action should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to invest in child safeguards.

Even as this international discussion evolves, the actions of this nation and several other countries indicate that governments globally are increasingly content to stand by for the industry to self-regulate.